In this pricing table welcome offer says 34.99 per 3 month which feels like you pay 35 euro for every 3 months but actually its only for the first 3 month and it auto renews at 69.99 euros.

i am not even sure how can this be legal.

  • zoostation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    18 days ago

    It says 50% off in a bright color, clearly indicating it’s on sale. And then immediately after, it explicitly clarifies that the non sale price will apply after the initial promotional offer term. This is standard and I don’t think it’s misleading. It’s just on sale.

    • Cattail@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      I could argue the asshole design is the subscription model, but it seems the European apps are not as exploitative as American ones

  • Gyroplast@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Uh… that’s not the issue I was expecting you to have here. Don’t we agree that 34,99 / 12 = 2,91 instead of 2,72 per week, making this the blatant lie? Not to mention that 20 €/month is quite obviously 5 €/week under the assumption of one month being equivalent to four weeks.

    Funnily enough, even assuming 29/30/31 days per month and 7 days per week doesn’t match either “weekly rate”. I have no idea what they’re doing other than writing anything down to make it seem like a “low price”. Similar to the “only 1 € per day!” offers.

    • Malix@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      seems like their math is, roughly:

      1 month = 30 days // "on average, days per month"
      30 days / 7 days = ~4,29 // weeks per "average month"
      34.99 / (3*4.29) = ~2,72 // and this is the weekly price for the 3 "average months".
      
      • Gyroplast@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        Thank you, kind stranger, I didn’t consider this variant! Certainly creative, but not optimal.

        If they chose instead to work with

        1 year365.2422 days
        365.2422 days / 12 months ≅ 30.44 days // per month on average
        30.44 days / 7 days ≅ 4.35 weeks // per avg. month34.99/ (3*4.35 weeks) ≅ 2.68/week  ∧  19.99/ 4.35 weeks ≅ 4.59/week
        

        their weekly rates would be even cheaper! Amateurs.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    That’s pretty much standard practice for subscriptions, hell, even classic contracts for ISPs for example, use this pricing scheme.

    I guess it’s asshole design … but it’s been around so long it feels silly pointing it out these days.

  • hubobes@piefed.europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    Intermittent fasting costs nothing but willpower (which for some can be an issue I know) and easily beats that quote.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    All the relevant conditions and prices, for the first three months as well as the time after, are right there in the ad.
    Not hidden away in small print on a 20-page contract.
    It even tells you how you can cancel it, and doesn’t give you an unreasonable cancellation deadline.
    I wonder why you think this shouldn’t be legal?