KEY POINTS

  • Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, whom President-elect Donald Trump appointed to lead a new government efficiency team, said they intend to call federal employees back to the office five days a week.
  • Companies such as Amazon and The Washington Post are adopting a similar policy in 2025.
  • But many companies will keep remote or hybrid work arrangements, largely because they boost profits, economists said.
  • Some view return-to-office mandates as a stealthy way to reduce employee head count.
  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    stupid control freaks. Because controlling of their employees is what RTO is about, control and paranoia.

    They are stupid paranoid control freaks who fear that their neat buildings stand empty and they cant just throw work at their wage slaves. So this is actually about control, paranoia, and vanity.

    • pezhore@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget sweetheart tax breaks from local municipalities on real estate!

      Sure you can have this huge complex company, because we know the 1500 people who work from the office will frequent the local Subway for lunch and that’s sales tax!

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        One of the benefits of working from home has been that my manager can no longer use standing staring at me as his main means of judging whether I’m doing work. The whole business of needing to see people working just smacks of shitty management.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Largely also true. In my office, my manager is remote anyway, so it doesn’t matter if I’m in my local office or home office.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So their reasons is control, paranoia, vanity, incompetence when it comes to remote management and their undivided devotion to the American Dollar.

        something something spanish inquisition

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            My new Aeron arrived two weeks ago. It replaced my 18 year old … Aeron. It has served me well, and needs just 200 in repairs (new pads, new struts, cylinder) so I may give it to my cousin.

            Yeah. Comfy chair, cool lifty desk, sweet river view, floofy cats. I dearly hope we can keep WFBest in our next union contract too.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many people do for the sole reason that you’re more productive when you’re comfortable and you’re probably going to be more comfortable at home.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          pretty much every office I’ve had to work in was either too cold or too hot. Hoodies in the summer and t-shirts in the winter. I don’t have that problem at home.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most mixed gender offices will have that issue. But also among the same gender one person is comfy at 19°C and another needs 23°C to not be cold.

            • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              One of the offices I worked in the HVAC was bizarre. The thermostat was by sales, but the cold air came out of a vent by eng on the other side of the building. Sales was hot, so they’d set a lower temperature. Eng would then get blasted by cold air, and sales would still be hot.

              “Nothing to be done about it. Wear a hoodie” said management. Fuck that.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost all desk work should be ad hoc.

        Get your shit done. Then do what ever until there’s more work to do.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actively do less work in the office.

        This is known. It’s been proven; for introverts and/or ADHD especially, since the interaction is stressful and/or completely disturbing. The difference is stark.

        But, for extroverts, the office can be where they thrive, and it’s the environment that lures them in. So unless they adapt (what? Them? But adapting is for the introverts who run the shit) quickly, they’re gonna be fish outta water in short order.

        There’s absolutely no automatic tangible benefit to RTO for those jobs that are remote capable (ie anything at a desk with no customer interface). Only a subset works marginally better with people to disturb, and I’ll question even that number or the benefit. The only reason they want you back in is this lie about being unable to manage your ass unless they can see your ass – which is the creepiest way to cover for “sunk cost fallacy” for the space lease.

        But yeah, keep some space for extroverts who can’t cope. It’s us being the better people about it.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s a terrible human being, but I don’t think he deserves to be sent back to Ohio.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They thank us by directly using their endless wealth to fuck us out of our last bit of political/economic power

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    First remote job I had was in 2010 making barely more than minimum wage for tier 1 phone support. These guys are off their rockers.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can Musk please, please, please, just fucking die already? Preferably burnt to death while trapped in a cybertruck. He’s just so stupid and has too much power, and I’m tired of people treating him like he’s worth more than utter contempt.

    Ramaswamy can go, too. Conspiracy theory peddling sycophant.

  • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck it, I’m saying it, I’m less productive when I work from home. I get to fuck off easier and I do genuinely miss in person collaboration on complex problems.

    That said, I’m probably never going to work another job that is more than 2 day hybrid. If every company in the world decided they would go back to 100% in person, I’d have to go back to working harder but as long as some companies care a tiny bit about the wellbeing of their workers, there will be this continuous push/pull of most companies wanting to squeeze every ounce of juice out of every worker.

    Tech is a weird industry tho. There are some companies that just rely on churn and burn through employees (cough cough spacex cough cough amazon cough cough). I’m lucky to have ended up in a specific sector where there is a lot of attrition due to frustration so they kind of just deal with the fact that they aren’t gonna get 100% out of everyone.

    All that is to say is that there are some interesting dynamics at play and I’ll hold the line, but there is a grain of truth in there but fuck capitalism, not everything has to be done as efficiently and as profitable as possible. Let people just live and work and chill

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t really find “I fuck off more at home” especially compelling. That sounds like a problem for you and your manager to deal with, and not something that everyone else needs to suffer for.

    • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck it, I’m saying it, I’m less productive when I work from home. I get to fuck off easier and I do genuinely miss in person collaboration on complex problems.

      This is me right here. But I go in 3 times a week into the office for my BioTech job. Works great for me.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m “racist” against billionaires and not even pretending not to be. There’s like no more than a small handful who do much (relative % I mean) good for anybody. Those should be noted and tasted normally (if they weren’t while on the way up), but they should be taxed out of existence. Il

    I don’t know what the number should be, but it shouldn’t be possible for your net worth to even approach a billion.

    Probably smaller than $50M. Shouldn’t be possible to surpass that much. Even that amount should be heavily forced into charity.

    If you’re in that upper echelon, I automatically hate you before I’ve heard of you, and I’m fairly confident the amount of times I’m wrong would be extremely small.

    Super rich people have to prove they’re worth not hating. Their default position is “hated idiot” until proven otherwise.

    There’s just so little possibility I wouldn’t want them dead in a vacuum (devoid of other moral considerations).

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m “racist” against billionaires

      Does that make you classist?

      Either way, all good. It ain’t racist if the fact they’re all white guys or Clearence Thomas is accidental or their own nepo action.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can think of two billionaires that I’m tentatively okay with. One sold a software service for a dollar a year to a couple billion people, and the other is a musician with an extremely valuable musical portfolio and popular live shows.
      The key part being that they almost entirely made their money by actually producing something themselves, not just leveraging money to make money or leeching off the work of others, and what they made actually provides value. $1 a year for communication services is a fair value, and the musician has easily provided more than a billion hours of enjoyment.

      I can’t think of anyone else that it seems reasonable to have that much money that actually has that much money.

      and tasted normally

      I agree we should eat the rich, but I’ll also admit that it’s a rare treat, so worth going all out on the seasoning and dining experience. At the least some fresh herbs and butter basted. :P

      I’d cap it high enough so that you can obviously retire with a life of luxury, leave your children unquestionably provided for, and start a few odd businesses without realistically risking the previous points.
      “Solving” you and your families material needs is sort of the endgame for wealth. The extra for random business ventures is because society actually benefits from people with safety nets taking risks to see if something makes money. It works better if we had a society wide safety net so failure doesn’t kill you, but even a limited form still has a benefit.

      Anything leftover shouldn’t go to charity, it should go back to the society that helped them get the money in the first place. Charity is good, but it’s ultimately a bandaid on social problems, and too often isn’t distributed evenly or without condition to those who need it. Taxes and entitlement programs won’t require a religious sermon to get food,

  • Norgoroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Musk and ramoswamy are foreign invader trash and they should go back to exploiting their own shitty countries. Fucking scum. Deport these counts or throw them in a detention center with no toilet. MAGA

    • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me too (exact same year)! It weirds me out when people are like “you never went back to the office?” Back? Why would I go in the first place? 🤣

    • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me too. Musk can’t actually manage people, but he can pretend more convincingly if he can see them in person and yell at them. There are a lot of managers like that and there are far more executives.

      My company looked at the actual business results from the period of COVID remote work. Productivity went up, so they decided to keep things that way. It also allowed them to get rid of all their office space, except for a sparsely populated headquarters building, which is saving them a lot of money.

      Most studies have shown that workers were more efficient when working remotely. Why would any executive want to reduce efficiency and increase infrastructure costs? The Return-To-Office push is not rational. It represents an inability to adapt to changing conditions. If boards were doing their jobs, they would be quietly showing those executives the door and looking for better people to run their companies.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Return-To-Office push is not rational.

        Like most stupid things in our world, it’s about emotions.

        This topic is funny to me because I worked for a place that was all about data. Data driven decisions. They had tshirts made that said like “Data > Feelings”.

        And yet when people brought up to the CEO stuff like studies showing WFH or 4-day-workweeks were effective, he just said “Nah, we’re not doing that.”. No discussion. No looking at the data. Just no.

        To his credit, that CEO did run a profitable startup with barely any funding, so he wasn’t a total fool. But on that kind of stuff he was a total gutfeel asshole.

        • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          People who run startups, even the successful ones, tend to be awful to their employees. I should say, especially the successful ones.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not irrational it just has more to do with corporate real estate and control than productivity or employee satisfaction. Large companies don’t do anything solely for the benefit of their employees.

        • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it is irrational, in the sense that executives’ sole legal responsibility, at least in the US, is to make as much money as possible for their shareholders. Favoring control over productivity is a violation of that. They are gratifying their egos instead of doing their jobs.

          Of course, in a sane world, how they treat their employees would be an issue, not just profitability.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Especially with land prices trending upwards. You don’t want to be the exec who has to explain that yes, productivity is up 15%, but you’re sitting on a skyscraper that nobody wants to buy because it’s worth $60mil or whatever.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Clearly you’re living a life of luxury and privilege unlike ordinary hard-working folk like… (tries to keep straight face)… Elon Musk.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was being sarcastic. You can’t have billionaires without exploiting everyone’s basic human needs for food, shelter, safety, healthcare, or freedom, and they’ll figure that out with a proper education.

      • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s the other one? Saving a ‘t’ in the process?
        Like

        Billionaires need to be taxed out of existance.

        ?

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Elon is probably only carrying that child on his shoulders all the time now as a human shield.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is how you know he knows fuck-all about America, cause we’re kinda indifferent to both collateral casualties and gun violence being the number one cause of death for children.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I worked at a national company of some fame for nearly 20 years. They have two main offices, one in the midwest and one in New England. Before COVID, it was common for folks to work from home, spread across the United States. We even had some fringe cases where people lived in England or Japan and worked from there. I don’t work there anymore, but I hear post covid they are forcing people to move and work from the office. It really is leadership brain rot, everywhere, regardless of industry.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didnt you hear he personally unlocked the Trump hotel bomb for law enforcement and sent them the surveillance footage of it being charged?