• Elon Musk accused of illegally selling $7.5 billion in Tesla stock in Q4 2022.
  • Lawsuit alleges Musk and board violated fiduciary duties by selling shares ahead of disappointing vehicle sales data.
  • Shareholder seeks disgorgement of $3 billion in illegal gains and damages from directors for reckless behavior.
    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      While “find the worst photo of them for the article” is definitely a thing that happens, are you sure it’s happening here? He just looks like a normal person in a normal pose. It’s what people look like without makeup and studio lighting.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Probably the opposite. There’s probably someone whose job it is to find and/or take flattering pictures of that asshole

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      So… i vaguelly knew about her so did some searching

      she served five months in federal prison for fraud and was released in March 2005. There was speculation that the incident would effectively end her media empire,[2] but in 2005 Stewart began a comeback campaign[3] and her company returned to profitability in 2006.[4] Stewart rejoined the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia in 2011[5] and became chairwoman of her namesake company again in 2012

      Its pretty mild isn’t it?

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        except they wont even do that to musk. Nobody wants to try a billionaire in court, musk is known to send armies of private detectives on people. He’ll close a factory in your district out of spite. Billionaires are afraid of taxes because as long as they have way too much money they can continue to do the illegal shit that made them rich.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well not for me and you. I have worked for public traded companies before and they would announce blackout periods where we weren’t able to sell. Since we worked inside the company and knew stuff the general public wouldn’t.

      Part of the many reasons why I won’t do another 401k and instead use a Roth.

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        What does a Roth vs 401k have to do with any of this? I buy index funds in both accounts, nothing to do with company stock programs whatsoever.

    • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well you have to account all the stress the poor people in power have to contend with each day. A little bonus at the end of the line is not that big of a deal. /s

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh NOOOOO! So you might point at this genius brain to tell us, he’s just another fraudster? NOOOOoooooo! Who whould have thought? /s

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    How could a CEO of any company trade his own stock from the company and not be insider trading?

    The fact they are allowed to control stock is laughable… At best, stock from the company you control should be in a blind trust (which would still be laughable but we can at least pretend)

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        So?.. I am the CEO… I know our new line of highly anticipated space tentacle dildos are not going to be in stores by Christmas as expected, I give notice and sell stock before the public finds out and stock goes down

        I also know, because of the delay, we are squeezing the Chinese manufacturer, so I will give notice and buy the stock in January knowing we are probably going to offer deep discounts to get those consumers back

        How is giving advance notice any safety? unless the rules say they need to give 500 days of notice or something long enough there is no possible way to predict properly with ALL the information and power a CEO would have to manipulate the stock

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The public will see the notice and sell their stock before the CEO can, tanking the price

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          If I’m a stock holder or potential buyer of stock and I read that the CEO is dumping billions of dollars of his own stock, I am going to think something bad is happening. Notifying the public in advance gives us more information to decide what we should do.

          Sometimes, that information just tells us this is a scheduled dump of a small percentage, which is normal and expected. Sometimes it is a huge dump, which is unexpected.

          • exanime@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            If I’m a stock holder or potential buyer of stock and I read that the CEO is dumping billions of dollars of his own stock, I am going to think something bad is happening. Notifying the public in advance gives us more information to decide what we should do.

            They don’t have to notify the public at all

            There is nothing in the SEC laws that makes it necessary to disclose the use of Rule 10b5-1 to the public, but that doesn’t mean companies shouldn’t release the information anyway. Announcements of utilizing Rule 10b5-1 are useful in warding off public relations problems and helping investors understand the logistics behind certain insider trades.

            source

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t want to defend CEOs here, but there is a code for in the USA, Rule 10b5-1, which sets out a CEOs stock trading plan.

          The reason, if you’re not Elon Musk, is that most CEOs are paid in stock and so it’s inevitable they’re going to sell some. So they set out a plan to say I will sell X shares on X date and the market shouldn’t be spooked.

          What Elon did here is sell 45 million shares, seemingly outside of any plan, which is insane. Usually they wouldn’t be offloading such a volume.

          Selling a small amount of your stock doesn’t indicate you don’t have faith in your own company, but more that you want to convert some of your reward (pay) into actual cash.

          I’m not saying the system is good, just that this is how it works.

          • exanime@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m not saying the system is good, just that this is how it works.

            Totally get it… which is why my comment was intended to mean “what the fuck kind of system is this”… not “Elon bad”… although, yes, Elon bad ;-)

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    When are Tesla shareholders going to wake up and understand that he’s scamming them. You’re all dupes and he’s going to ride you to the last second and let you all burn.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They are accepting his request to give him 50b$ worth of extra stock, at the same time as they are laying off people. What a joke.

  • Ballistic_86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Insider trading seems to have been perfectly legal for the last few decades. Nothing will come of this or it would start setting precedent that we could use against our government leaders and other billionaires and federal judges. Not gonna happen.

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      No. She went to jail for lying to the feds.

      Her financial manager was suspected of insider trading. The FBI questioned her about it and she lied to them in an attempt to protect him.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Probably. She was not found guilty of lying about her reason for selling the stock in question, though she was found guilty of obstruction and other lies, along with conspiracy.

          She was never charged with insider trading, so if she hadn’t lied, she would likely have been fine.

          Interestingly, they also charged her with securities fraud. They argued that, as the face of a publicly traded company, covering up a crime was market manipulation even if it had nothing to do with that company. The judge dismissed that charge.

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      its only illegal if youre dumb enough to not be paying judges and politicians. its not even a lot of money either like a couple thousand and theyll vouch for you