

So, you now learned that human behaviour is often silly when observed without context


So, you now learned that human behaviour is often silly when observed without context


Because it is a word, or it’s easier to say, or funnier.
It’s definitely not the only case. NATO comes to mind, or GOAT, NIMBY. Yesterday I heard someone say (in a tv series episode) ‘fudney’ for FDNY
What it ‘actually’ is does not matter.
It’s ICE, as in: cold as


I have a small site with no robots.txt . Google search console still shows the same number of search results as in the last few months (around 800/month)
Good question. So, perform an experiment: put an ice cube without air bubbles in a glass containing a mixture of ice and cold water. The temperature should become 0°C (just before it freezes), measure it.
Your hypothesis: ice is heavier than water, so it will sink
Execute the test several times, preferably 10 times or more. More is better.
Please share your experiment results. Interesting data to know for each test would include:
please also share your conclusion.


You mean I, II, III, IV, IX, V, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI, XII


People that use a keyboard spell out each word they type. They still need spellcheckers.


Why? Do you think signing is done by spelling out words?


It was not that long ago when Android changed my on screen keyboard to a different layout whenever I was in a different country. Really annoying - I don’t suddenly type in Danish when I’m on a business trip to Lyngby (near Copenhagen)


Do you really assume that language does not change if there is no AI involved in teaching? Try reading texts from a century – or even 50 years – ago.
I am not an AI fan but your argument is just fearmongering.


I’m no specialist, but (1) don’t most solar panels have a fixed inclination and orientation? Depending on the location that will not be as optimal at each day of the year because of the tilt of the earth. (2) The weather/cliimate will have an effect too. Your 2nd image is apparently showing kWh/kWp - so the longer term yield (h=hours) divided by the theoreticall maximum (p=peak). So it shows longer term efficiency , vs the yield at a certain moment like you appear to be focusing on.


That is what ‘automation’ often is. You take a working process, then let machines do as many steps in that process as you can. Harvesting crops, sending memos, robots spraypainting car parts, self driving cars (We still have a lot to do there)
Building on that it gets even more interesting as we try to find better, or even completely new processes.


You are wrong, till is perfectly fine – and so is til. See Merriam-Websters article about this, at https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/should-you-use-until-or-till-or-til


No speed cap yet, but all new cars sold in the EU must have a signal that alerts the driver if they’re driving faster than the current speed limit.
https://www.autoweek.com/news/a61532276/mandatory-speed-limiters-europe-cars/
deleted by creator


In this case, the bold parts in paragraphs 1 and 3 highlight the same line of thought (Trumps allegations are echoed by many), where none of the important parts of paragraph 2 (it leads to harmful effects) are bold are all.


I find your boldening of phrases very annoying.
cursive writing