There are so many brands of e-liquid and they aren’t required to publish ingredient lists, so the answer is probably “some of them, yeah”.

What’s worse than the President of the world’s most influential nation being part of a child sex trafficking scheme? Other than nuclear war, which would be pretty hard to distract people from.

Plus, if you had two-day battery life, when the battery inevitably degrades, you’ll still have solid battery life.

But the companies want you to buy a new phone when the battery degrades.

Nah, it used to mean coke-addled idiot.

Censorship is bad, but Facebook and X’s entire business models revolve around spreading content that is at once false and inflammatory, either just to create engagement or for more malicious purposes, and they reach a huge portion of the population directly, including children, teenagers, the mentally ill and other vulnerable populations. This requires a new understanding of accountability for spreading information.

I wouldn’t agree that it makes sense to hold a Mastodon instance responsible for what its users post, because they don’t have a financial incentive or the ability to promote misinformation at a massive scale. Twitter does. As Aristotle said, we must treat equals equally, and treat the unequal unequally according to the form and extent of their inequality.

The sea is not “a salt brine in itself”. You need a much higher salt concentration to pickle anything than what you find at any point in the ocean. Enough to prevent microbial life forms from surviving and consuming whatever it is you’re trying to pickle, which is why it doesn’t rot while pickling.

uBlock Origin works in Firefox for me. No ads on YT.

Interest is an increase in price*. Lower interest isn’t a discount, it’s a smaller increase. Calling it a discount is like punching you instead of stabbing you and calling it nonviolence.

*In exchange for better payment conditions, but that’s not relevant to the point.

Wouldn’t a narcissist fret a lot about their public image, even what’s left of it after their death? I mean, the way this man brags about winning at golf, having every other country “kissing [his] ass” asking for deals after the tariffs, scoring high marks on his intelligence dementia tests, etc, it’s quite clear he cares a lot about being seen as a powerful and talented person.

I don’t know much about narcissism other than the popular definition so of course I could be completely wrong.

“Better” doesn’t tell the whole story. There are hundreds if not thousands of different technologies involved in making an electric vehicle, from material selection for the frame to batteries to all the different components, software, conforming, etc. BYD cars may be overall superior to Tesla cars (I don’t know if they are, both are above my budget) but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t two or three hundred little things that Tesla cars still do better.

All hail the orphan crushing machine.

That actually makes sense. I wouldn’t hop on one foot, though. That increases the odds of falling flat.

Keeping your feet close together makes zero difference, as what matters is the actual contact surface between you and the ground and not the area defined between your feet. Ideally you should reduce that to zero, but humans are not generally known for their ability ro hover in midair.

Tesla has a higher market share still. This is changing but it’s not that quick.

None of the choices here are good, but clearly bending over and letting Trump fuck everyone is worse than the alternatives. China is also not going to take this lying down and they have a lot of potential for damaging Trump because so much of the USA’s manufacturing is outsourced there and they can more easily compensate with other partners than Canada can. If Canada, China and Mexico stick to their guns, together, long enough for the American people to do something about this idiot, then things can still work out.

If a threat from an unelected foreign Nazi is all it takes to keep you from doing your job, you’re not fit to hold public office.

They can’t unless the parties agree that they can. The sneaky part is the “by continuing to use our services, you agree to the new terms” part, which is standard practice. You’d have to terminate your account before the new terms come into effect, then take them to court to make sure they didn’t keep your data around and use it to train their AI anyway because they “didn’t notice” that that particular content belonged to someone who didn’t accept the new terms.

Are you denying that it’s getting exponentially worse by the day?

Nothing suspicious at all about being contacted by the subject of a news story just to say it’s not newsworthy. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

If “voters” means the same in both cases, why did you use numbers that specifically only apply to the last election to make a point?