I wouldn’t call it “big tech”. The biggest problem is that none of the chats are encrypted by default. And even if you do use “secret chats”, the encryption there doesn’t seem to be up to PAR with modern standards.

The creator previously refused to comply with warrants but since he was jailed in France, that’s pretty much over.

A good messenger is unable to comply, by design, because it simply does not store the data that these govts are after.

Astonishing that they would think replacing someone else’s human-written title with an AI generated one would be a good idea. There’s just no lengths they won’t go to to shove AI everywhere humanly possible.

After spinning up some LLMs and image generating tools, I realized the hardware consumes a lot of electricity, and even 12GB VRAM sometimes wasn’t enough. On top of that, these AI programs also use a lot of system RAM. Now imagine being a big company like OpenAI or Grok with millions of users. How much GPU power and electricity would it take to keep their service running? That’s why these companies are seeking lots of investment.

Not a bubble because: it actually uses the amount of energy they claim? No one thinks they’re lying about that.

these AI investors know what they’re doing

LOOOOLOLOL. I think there are some initial investors who, in the beginning, legitimately thought it would be a good deal. At this point, the investments are driven by hype, and investors know they are, but they’re gambling that they can ride it to the top without being caught holding the bag. That’s why it will collapse violently. Because the moment it starts going down, everyone is going to dump it.

Of course, AI-generated content is polluting the internet like never before. But the problem is that you still like or share these AI slop, making them go viral.

Okay so we’re now: changing the topic entirely, while blaming users for the poisoning of the information database that is the internet.

So it’s a 2 paragraph blog post that doesn’t even address it’s own title.

If the AI box funds development of mobile Linux then… 🤷

LOL imagine banning an account from an organization that just fined you 130 million Euros and having the gall to pretend like it’s not about the fine…

Why even bother? Who is going to believe that?

Only if you collude with other companies to do do…

Too bad he’s an engineer and not a lawyer.

…which is different from the Stream Frame.

Hasn’t stopped them thus far

Because they were able to learn from the technology that was created.

Did Google create this standard? I’m just not sure why they’re being mentioned. It’s like saying your email account is “Gmail compatible”.

Matrix is pretty rough, in many ways.

What does “Google Authenticator compatible” mean?

The app doesn’t fit the OSI open source definition since you cannot modify and redistribute it.

a handy addition

[Citation needed]

Yes that is why I said “generally”.

Donate it? It’s probably fine for completing most tasks that normal people need but can’t afford better.

Honestly maybe that’s a good thing? AI seems to generally be more in touch with reality than anyone in the federal gov.

Not later than anyone else that hopped on the chat gpt bandwagon.

Sure, but I did specifically say mobile video surveillance. Pretty sure their goal is to reduce the friction of taking out your phone to start capturing a video.

I’ve already ended a friendship over these stupid things.