You can ask the LLM the same question a hundred times and it might not give you the same answer it gave someone else. The way it responds is a combination of random chance and the language used to ask the question.

They are separate clauses in that sentence. Please learn to read.

ok well, the people who use github and write programs are probably a lot more likely to have experience with claude than you are so they probably didn’t make the same assumptions you did!

Because most people have at least tried these products and it’s not like the agent is being hidden away. It makes commits to your repo using its name as the author (for now).

Do you assume anyone who knows something you don’t has no life? Strange way to live.

cpython is the reference implementation of the python interpreter. The person who took this screenshot has the Claude user on GitHub blocked so that whenever it contributed to a git repo you see this warning. The Claude user is an AI agent. AI code is garbage.

Same Rothschilds that are all over the Epstein files?

Edit: nope, it seems they’re unrelated.

We’re just going to see the head of state do a propaganda speech. Why is everyone being so political about it?

Pretty on the nose that the Israeli spyware company named their spyware after what we call people who sexually assault children.

Unless you’re based in or have some kind of presence in those countries there’s no reason to even ban them. Banning by geolocation isn’t exactly trivial or reliable. Let them figure out a way to ban you instead.

So he used an AI tool to “organize” references and it hallucinated crap that made it into the human-written article because he never reviewed the output for accuracy.

This guy writes about AI for a living, he knows it hallucinates, and he even acknowledges the irony but never explains why he thought experimenting with AI was a good idea to begin with. Am I supposed to assume his judgment was impaired by being sick?

Letting them win because you’ve conceded before even playing is also a losing formula. Even if they don’t get awarded monetary damages they can probably at least get their legal expenses covered.

Libel. Taking it down doesn’t undo the damage to reputation which libel is concerned with. They might not get any monetary damages awarded but could maybe force Ars to put out a retraction.

South African-born

Hmmm

There’s a giant, glowing, animated LED billboard along a main road near my house that had a PSA about distracted driving on it the other day. It made me angry.

deleted by creator

Yeah of course they matter, thanks for making really weird assumptions about my morals based on a domain name you fucking weirdo. Do they justify supporting any given country invading them is the question here. I don’t think there’s a number that could get me to support that but it seems like you have one you’re just not willing to name it. So far it’s narrowed down between 6 and 36000.

Sure, but I think wanting to fuck children does kind of paint a vivid picture about your general moral character in a way your dietary preferences might not.

So you don’t currently feel it would be justified to overthrow the US government over what happened in MN? Interesting.

Edit: so what’s the threshold here? How many they gotta execute in the streets for you to support Iran bringing freedom to the American people?

He had the x.com domain name purchased back then, too. A loser for the entirety of his life.

Imagine if Iran sent planes loaded with bombs to the US because of the MN protestors getting killed.