David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 17 days agoAI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slowerpivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up1155arrow-down1external-linkAI coders think they’re 20% faster — but they’re actually 19% slowerpivot-to-ai.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square103linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·17 days agoThe hypothetical is literally underskilled newbies replacing oldhats.
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·17 days agothe astute reader may note a certain part of my comment addressed a particular aspect of this
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down4·17 days agoand yet you’re still wrong. Interesting how popularity isn’t correlated with correctness.
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 days agoYou’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 days agoand upon hearing the lesson, the journeyman went to the pub
The hypothetical is literally underskilled newbies replacing oldhats.
the astute reader may note a certain part of my comment addressed a particular aspect of this
and yet you’re still wrong. Interesting how popularity isn’t correlated with correctness.
You’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…
and upon hearing the lesson, the journeyman went to the pub