• Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    They’re redundant. It’s just a differently shaped dumbbell. Not necessary at all, if dumbbells are available. If dumbbells aren’t available, kettlebells are a poor substitute for dumbbells, whereas if kettlebells aren’t available and dumbbells are, dumbbells are an OK substitute for kettlebells.

    “But what about kettlebell swings?”

    NO. Just no.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Kettlebells are focused on compound exercises. I don’t know where you came up with this:

      If dumbbells aren’t available, kettlebells are a poor substitute for dumbbells, whereas if kettlebells aren’t available and dumbbells are, dumbbells are an OK substitute for kettlebells.

      I can’t think of any dumbbell exercises that couldn’t use a kettlebell if it’s all you had, but dumbbells are not well suited at all to kettlebell exercises.

      And I don’t know why you hate swings, they’re a fantastic way to build squat form.