Yeah? The comments are based on published, publicly available claims made by others that she has not sued the original author over. Plus, disclosure could be fun. Go for it.
another insane day in America
At this point, it’s just a normal day.
Supreme Court ain’t gonna care
Ooooh, discovery is going to be fun. An illegal alien sex worker who becomes first lady having mile high adulterous sex is going to make great, and interesting news.
They’ll get the case routed to a MAGA judge.
I await the discovery phase of the inevitable lawsuit.
in legalese, that’s the “find out” from the latin “Fuck around and find out”
Futuis circ et invenies de
Vagabundus, invenies.
For her to actually jump in, means there’s truth to bidens statement. Must be true
What the fuck is this “on notice” bullshit?
He got a cease and desist, or lawsuit threat.
Am I just getting old and I can’t understand the news anymore?
We need to use dramatic, divisive language that no one really uses in real life to draw in more clicks/views for our six trillion ad partners.
When is ICE hauling her off to the gulag?
Hunter be like…
Didn’t realize she was still around.
She’s not around Donny’s chode anymore, that’s for sure
WTF is bpdaily.com?
Are there any Lemmy instances that have higher standards for news sources?
i think it is to some extent up to us to regulate this, which is good and bad. I would also be interested in other news instances, but it seems like all of them have some amount of garbage linked sources. I just try to call it out in the comments so other people will double check on the validity of the headline as well. Community moderation may be better than a single moderator with the power of ‘censoring’ the whole instance. Also, by writing really long paragraphs like this maybe we can draw peoples eyes to the fact that our up/down votes also regulate what links/sources get traction and that catchy headlines may not be enough to warrant a vote up.
