• sping@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    But an oily dark roast on good beans will taste almost identical to an oily dark roast on shitty beans.

    Ultimately though, we’re just disagreeing on a simple linear ordering because a simple linear ordering is inadequate to describe it.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Dark roast is what you do to make poor beans drinkable. Good beans are ruined with dark roasts.

      I respectfully disagree and stand by my linear progression. My best guess is that you haven’t had good beans and a light roast, so you may not even be aware.

      • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You’re not making any sense.

        Good beans are ruined with dark roasts.

        That’s my point, you’re making from me, before your patronizing bullshit. I know coffee you fuckwit. And I know that a bad roast can render the bean quality irrelevant, therefore it’s more significant than bean quality. And it illustrates that the a linear progression of importance doesn’t make a lot of sense.

        But just carry on assuming nobody else knows anything and they’re just confused, it’ll probably make you happier.