• wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, so I am all about working to resolve climate change, very active in the movement even.

    But gosh golly gee, can we talk about that particular websites UI for a moment? I do not need a roll ad every 3 seconds. And I really do not need to know that one weird trick on how to get rats to like me.

    Again, all for the climate. I’m saying this as I just walked 45 minutes to go grab my lunch. Totally on board with more buses and trains. Big advocate of a Citizens Climate Lobby. Doing my part, hope you do too.

    Keep the rats the f away from me!

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meh. I respectfully disagree. This is the system we designed. It’s working exactly as intended. What we need is a sea change. The system is broken and that’s evident everywhere. The path we are on doesn’t work. The only way to course correct is for everyone to get on the same page and as is witnessed during the yearly COP meetings clearly the rich nations don’t fully care about the poor countries. Things are changing but dreadfully slow.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know right? The faster shit gets really really bad, the faster people will (hopefully) start building homemade guillotines.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have to hope things get better, because no matter how bad things get, they can always get worse. People will see things getting worse as evidence that it hasn’t gotten worse enough. The idea that there is some point where it can get bad enough to spur positive change is false. The positive change that has happened in society originates from people wanting things to get better.

        We have to convince people to want things to get better, by showing them it can be better. Too many people are worried about losing the little they have. People have to see we can all be living more complete lives without harming the planet.

        • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          We don’t have any evidence to suggest it will get better. I’m also not really sure what you mean by “more complete lives.” That’s gotta be subjective, right? I don’t think I’m an accelerationist though, I think I’m just against human life period.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            We don’t have any evidence to suggest it will get better.

            We know how to make things better. We need to get off fossil fuels and capitalism. Hoping it will get worse won’t work. It will just get worse. People have made things better before. We are living in the success of optimistic activists who believed they could make the world a better place. We need to do the same.

            I’m also not really sure what you mean by “more complete lives.”

            How about making more money. Eating food and breathing air that doesn’t kill us. Working for ourselves and not billionaires. Having third spaces where people can be a part of a community, instead of being isolated.

            I’m just against human life period.

            This is literally the root of the flawed ideologies of our time. I implore you to reconsider. We are all in this together.

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not with that attitude. We know how to implement socialism while maintaining a market economy and how to improve our democracy to achieve majority rule. All of it is logistically doable and well understood. What we need is the political will to do it.

      • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally I’d prefer any way that doesn’t shovel the less abled and less privileged into the Accelerationism Machine as fuel.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you still have hope that humanity will stop destroying (the human habitability of) our only habitat in the name of short-term private profit for humanity’s most prolific sociopaths, at least share the kind of drugs you’re on.

    “LINE MUST GO UP!”

    -Homo Sapien, ~200,000 BCE - ~2100 AD

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well since there’s nothing I can do then I guess it’s time to kick back and wait for the end of humanity. We had a good run.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can and you should (and you probably already do).

      Kick back and know that you’re doing something, whatever it is.

      • umulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nicely said.

        And even if we could do a bit more, why should we make more sacrifices, when big corporations are accountable for much of the environment’s issues?

        • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would a couple of fossile destroyers change their very lucrative business-model if millions of first world citizens are just as cheap, greedy and irresponsible as well? I’m pretty sure a lot of us would act very much like them, if we were put in their places. It’s so easy to point fingers at the billionaires. As long as they don’t change, why should I?! To be a better person, that’s why! Fuck those psychopaths, stop consuming!

          • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “live a shittier, lower quality life for no reason because you’re fucked anyways” why though? An environment sounds great, but it’s obviously not in the cards for us. Why purposely have a worse life? HedonismBot could teach us a thing or two tbh, if we’re gonna burn the earth to a crisp anyways might as well have fun, no?

  • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    me when i destroy the planet to get just 1 more green piece of paper that means jack shit in the grand scheme of things

    genuinely think money is an addiction to these big oil fucks

    • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a way of keeping score. They don’t care where the money comes from any more, just that they have more than some other guy.

      People who care about people generally don’t get rich, because they are kind and helpful people and will spend money on others.

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    if we exceed the 1.5°C warming target set by the Paris Agreement.

    Pretty sure previous studies have already confirmed we’re already blowing past 2°C even if we stopped producing CO2 today.

    Not to be too doomer about it but we’re already too late to prevent centuries of damage. What we can do now is try and keep the ecosystem from becoming completely uninhabitable.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not to be pedantic, but the target is a ten year trailing average. It’s a crime that we’ve likely hit it for a year or two already, and that shows how urgent the problem is but we’ve still got 5 years or so

      Even worse carbon emissions haven’t yet peaked, much less started dropping, and way less quickly than they need to drop

      • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not really how that works. The 2°C increase is a prediction of how average temperatures will increase based on already existing carbon in the atmosphere.

        If we stop emitting today, the average temperature will still increase beyond 2°C and stay there unless there’s another force actively removing the CO2 from the atmosphere.

        This isn’t “if we stop emitting today, we’ll peak at 2°C increase and then it’ll go back down” the 2°C prediction is a permanent increase to the average temperature.

        The damage is done. Millions will likely die regardless of how much carbon we put out from this point forward. The fight now is to decrease the people that will die beyond that number.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those extra years don’t mean anything though. It’s the target that matters. Just because 10 years was predicted doesn’t mean we can do whatever we want in this 10 years as long as it fixed right before that mark.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          10 year average was the target definition. Not only does this not mean we can sit on our asses, but it also does NOT mean we have nine lives left

  • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really wish there was a way to block this kind of stuff from all my feeds. I already know this, and there is nothing I can do to stop it from happening, so I really don’t want to see it.

      • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that still won’t do shit when a company like ExxonMobil produces more pollution in a single year than thousands of people will in an entire lifetime. Don’t sit here and act like anything I do will make a difference just because it makes you feel better.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It will cause at least one less gram to be emitted. You said nothing, but what you can do isn’t nothing. It’s just not much. But this is the survival of all life on earth we’re talking about.

          Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, it’s not going to get better. It’s not.

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            We have millions of people who care, and even if every single one of us produced a carbon neutral footprint(which isn’t possible for everyone) it still wouldn’t stop what’s coming at this point. It would slow it down but not stop it because 100 companies are responsible for 71% of all greenhouse gasses, and only 25 companies and state owned orgs are responsible for over 50% of the global industrial emissions. Without stopping them, you are throwing an icecube on a forest fire.

            Hell, the top 1% of co2 producers produce 1000 times more than the bottom 1% which is you and me.

            • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              So buy one more day for us to have a revolution and end the pollution. If you have 1/100000000000000 the power of an oil CEO, and you still use that power polluting the environment for your own convenience, then what makes you better than them? That you would theoretically have done less damage if only your actions mattered a little more?

              • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you want a revolution, then you need to get their hands bloody, and people are not willing to do that. I don’t blame them I’m not willing to either.

                • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well I am. I’m participating in mutual aid and direct action orgs with the aim of assembling an apparatus for distributing weapons and committing insurrection against the government. Also I don’t drive a car or eat meat. My behaviours are designed to stop climate change at every level of action. You won’t engage in individual action, and you won’t engage in collective action, so what’s your big idea? Giving up? No thanks.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those things are helpful and nice, but they aren’t even close to enough. As long as conservatives hold any power, billionaires and corporations will continue to cook the planet. To combat global heating, we must combat conservatism.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Buy a gun. Participate in direct action and protests. Help organise mutual aid structures. Spread class consciousness. Assassinate a conservative politician. Storm the capital.

          I didn’t list these things earlier because they require a bigger commitment than being carfree or vegan. I wanted to start with the easy stuff.

      • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, that worked back in the day but it doesn’t work now because Republicans, conservatives, and people who own those people don’t care about saving the planet and don’t care about real actual science anymore. They will flatbout refuse to listen to facts, reason, and logic, so it’s impossible to have actual real conversations with them. If that stuff still worked, then we would already be working on trying to reverse what is happening, and we would be passing laws and issuing fines in the billions to companies like Exxon and BP.

        Think about it. If we had the hole in the ozone right now instead of in the 80s there is absolutely no fucking way they would have passed the laws to fix it and the same goes for all the acid rain we had. If you think that stuff works, then please sell me whatever copium you have cuz christ could I use some.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. If we aren’t fighting conservatism, we aren’t fighting climate change.

          Conservatives are the army of the billionaires. Global heating will continue until conservatism is defeated. There is simply no way around this.

      • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Repression against climate activism is (in my view) at an all-time high with movements even labeled as terrorists and a certain part of the populace agreeing with injuring or even killing members of climate activist groups. Not something I’d want to put myself into. :/

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is wild, the exact same discussion with the exact opposite upvotes would happen in the progressivepolitics community.

      But to the point about “not being able to do anything” that’s just not true. Is it singularly enough to reverse or accelerate climate change? No, but that’s not the question is it. Anything is anything. Can you do anything? Yes.

      The answer is Yes. So please do. You’re walking instead of driving? Eating less meat? Good. There you go - no need to crawl into a hole and die, you’re doing something. It’s not nothing. It’s good.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even with appliances or vehicles: if you’re going to buy one anyway, you can choose increased efficiency and you’ve done something, no matter how small.

  • openrain502r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Companies and billionaires when the only thing they care about are multicoloured laminated pieces of paper that basically mean nothing once someone’s wealth is high enough: