The true cost of generative AI is the erosion of trust.

  • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    We don’t need code words, we need a proper PKI (public key infrastructure) for authenticated communication.

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You receive a call from an unknown number and they tell you they’ve kidnapped your wife. They then give her the phone so you can hear her but she didn’t do it through Signal so she’s obviously not your wife so you just hang up.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You can use this to your benefit though

        husband/wife walks up to you to start an argument

        “sorry honey, you need your public key”

        Instant win

      • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I wouldn’t recommend doing that.

        And that’s not how you establish a PKI or implement AE (authenticated encryption). When I send a voice message e.g. I don’t verbally sign it, that’s actually part of KE (key exchange) protocol.

        Same applies to non encrypted, authenticated communication of course.

        And in case you are talking about physical face to face communication: I think you’d recognize your family and friends without the help of cryptography.

        Edit: if you have any question, feel free to ask! Maybe I misunderstood you? Then I’m sorry

  • Eww@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Anyone born in the 80’s probably still has the code word their parents gave them.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Eww y’all have a code word? Those are easily guessable.

    My wife and I have a random 6 digit code that rotates every 30-seconds based on an algorithm and if we don’t properly authorize, we will refuse the connection.

  • vala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Could just ask me about some niche topic im always info dumping about lmao.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wait you actually had a code word for when a stranger approached you?

      I thought that was a joke

      • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly I don’t remember anymore if we had a code word or not, but it was definitely discussed with parents and school officials; probably in D.A.R.E too. The premise is that a kidnapper might try to trick you with: “Your mom is [working late / in the hospital / etc.], she asked me to pick you up today.” If they don’t have the password, then you don’t go with them.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          that is a fucking wild concept lol, in what scenario would a parent ask someone the kid doesn’t know to pick them up? like even if you 100% trust someone, that doesn’t work if the kid has never met them!

          • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I mean, yeah, that makes sense to you and me, but not every child would make that deduction? Some kids are friendly and trusting, and even if the child is wary of strangers and instructed not to go with them, a kidnapper can just say that they are a parent’s coworker, or that they work at the hospital where their sick parent is, or whatever other lie or sounds convincing to a child. Little kids don’t have the context to see through that bullshit yet.

            At least that’s the premise.

            But, it also applies to people the kid does know, but may not be expecting: an aunt or uncle, a coach, teacher, a friends parent, a parents friend… since we now know (or at least it has been better disseminated) that most kidnappings are done by someone close to the child or family. The kid should still ask for the password if it’s not a pre scheduled “Grandma picks me up Wednesdays and Thursdays” kind of thing.

            I’m no child safety expert; that’s just what I remember.

  • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Between this and the recommendation to fall back to encrypted communication, this almost looks like someone trying to bootstrap a populace trained to evade the feds.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve discussed this years back, and decided our safe phrase is “Hi gramma, it’s me im in jail and need apple gift cards”

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trust is dead, the foundation of communication was laid to rest without another soul in sight.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Except theres not cause the MAGAts are out drooling on the streets, in your workplace, and at the cornerstore 24/7 making sure you know their silver spooned, first-generation immigrant, traitor usurper is For The People.