• Empricorn@feddit.nlEnglish
    32·
    4 个月前

    Okay, so Russia has been aggressive, but what about the time NATO attacked… uh… yeah.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        5·
        4 个月前

        I’m not pretending that was a genius move from NATO or even that it was justified, but you didn’t have to read that far…

        The bombings continued until an agreement was reached that led to the withdrawal of the Yugoslav Army from Kosovo

        • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mlEnglish
          13·
          4 个月前

          What about

          NATO launched its campaign without the UN’s approval, stating that it was inter alia a humanitarian intervention.

          and the fact that Yugoslavia had more than 1000 died and more than 5000 injured, while NATO’s loss was negligible?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPMEnglish
        4·
        4 个月前

        “What about that time NATO attacked genocidaires in the process of committing genocide on another country and stopped as soon as the genocidaires withdrew?”

        Yeah, I guess that was pretty horrific.

        • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mlEnglish
          13·
          4 个月前

          Are you saying NATO in order to stop a genocide, they killed the side who started the genocide? Well that sounds exactly like a genocide to me!

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPMEnglish
            2·
            4 个月前

            Are you saying NATO in order to stop a genocide, they killed the side who started the genocide? Well that sounds exactly like a genocide to me!

            Jesus Christ.