What’s the book called, and is it a Langdon book?

Well I don’t think they’d bring a corpse to a death camp

Just wanted to say that I personally found this hilarious.

No way am I taking orders from a Venusaur, idgaf how good your Sp. Atk is 😂

This checks out somehow 😂

The first half is plausible, but the second half is sus.

Is this where the term “duck typing” comes from?! TIL 🤦🏻‍♂️😂

Can confirm 😂

This was the original comment you made. The joke was “ajar heads”. This is a very clever little joke, if based on a misunderstanding of the term jar head. I don’t see how you could think this was some “fantasy”, friend, but maybe now I’m misunderstanding lol

Physics student here: not down voting the physics down voting the “Ackshually” in response to a joke that was really funny

My bad, I was unclear, I had meant wrt him saying “the big one”. Thank you for aggregating all of this info!

Could you elaborate?

This made my coffee come out of my nose lmfao

Gone to kiss the ring more like

The raccoon angle is new information to me, and adds a large factor that I will consider. I still believe that the outcome is tragic, that the laws should be different so as to prevent these tragedies. We’ve been encroaching on these species’ habitats and while some have the opinion that “nature” is separate from human life, and would argue that we should separate ourselves from the natural world and not engage with it, I argue that that is precisely the problem. We’re not separate from nature or “the wild”, and we can’t pretend that ignoring them does anything. Ultimately, they will not ignore us, because we’re here, and we’re an intrinsic part of their environments.

Furthermore, I find your argument a bit two-faced. Intervention and engagement is okay if they’re pests or have a 0.0006% (rough figure based on actual calculations) chance of having rabies, but that’s it, huh? How would you respond if this was a pest in your home? I assume you’d alert animal control or an exterminator, and wash your hands of it once they were out of your hair, regardless of the outcome.

All of that being said, the presence of the raccoon complicates things enough for me to say that I think this was an unavoidable outcome given the animal control system, but still it should’ve been handled differently and just because this is “normal” doesn’t mean that it isn’t short in the morality department.

This is an excellent point, and I was unaware of the raccoon’s presence. Was the raccoon also seized? It didn’t mention it in the original article.

Was your point that it’s cause…what? We started outlawing pet squirrels? That’s such a weird stance

This guy gets it ^^^

Because we vaccinated dogs who used to account for most of the rabies infections prior to the 1947 vaccination push. Not because people use to have pet squirrels lmfao (source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6823e1.htm?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery)

Also, you’re right that my comment was uncalled for. I was a little too passionate, and should’ve been more calm and clear headed. Of course there’s no “making their animals suffer” here, so you can put your straw man and your ad hominem back in your utility belt, my friend. My intent would’ve been more clear had I said “I hope that they can learn to be empathetic in these situations”, and I fell into the fallacy that empathy comes from feeling the same pain, which I know isn’t true. So I agree that my comment was distasteful, and have thus removed it.