I’ll look into it. Appreciate your time, thank you. I’m going to search “what instance would Brannan Lee Mulligan choose” and see where this get me ;) see you on the other side.
- 0 Posts
- 34 Comments
Thank you. I need to find new instance for myself because lemme.ee. can you tell me why you chose blahaj.zone? I don’t want to support Russia in any way or form. It should be boycotted.
But I also think that crony capitalism will be our downfall. I try to reduce my reliance on US-based products, serviced and culture. Especially, on giants like google, disney, MS, etc. Boycotting US until they rethink they approach to allies like Canada, EU and Ukraine is also called for.
If you don’t mind, what would you recommend to someone who would like their revolution with no gulags?
What was your concern with lemmy.ml?
deleted by creator
Ideonek@lemm.eeto World News@lemmy.world•New Zealand passes record suspension of lawmakers over hakaEnglish51·2 months agoBut fillerbusters are appropriate process of disturbing voting that are not a treats to democracy, right?
There is more to voting than casting a vote.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto World News@lemmy.world•New Zealand passes record suspension of lawmakers over hakaEnglish25·2 months agoDid you miss the part about how disproportional the punishment was compared to any other given in the past?
Ideonek@lemm.eeto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•To join Facebook these days, one must record a video selfieEnglish52·2 months agoSomehow I find it very disconcerting, that you didn’t write “our” lifetime.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto News@lemmy.world•'Is the president not telling the truth?', judge asks about Trump's Abrego Garcia comments423·3 months ago“You” was not direcred at the judge. It was you “The People”.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto News@lemmy.world•'Is the president not telling the truth?', judge asks about Trump's Abrego Garcia comments937·3 months agoYou allowed sending over 100 people to a death camp. But, yes, judge poked Trupm in the smallest most indirect way possible. Let’s celebrate the win. System is working. We csn rest.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•What's the next stop on the authoritarianism express?6·3 months agoNot sure what the next one is, but the last one will be the “War on internal terror” aka IWOT. After that it’s over
You ignored something as bluntly unlawful as orwelian Patrioct Act becouse it was happening to “them”. The ammended one will happen to you.
Ok, but ir’s a cheat code for non-existing problem since non of those countries tax you with addituonal tarifs.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto World News@lemmy.world•Russia’s Lavrov praises Trump’s understanding of Ukraine conflictEnglish191·4 months agoAlternative headline: Hospital administration getting prises from cancer.
It walks, sounds, smells and looks like a bullshit. I wonder what could it be?
‘So where fans can find you now?’ He asked, so she didn’t hesitate to share links to her books and arts.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto News@lemmy.world•US says it needs more time to plan return of man mistakenly deported to El Salvador prison16·4 months agoIf this story allone doesn’t terrify you to the bone something is seriously wrong with you.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto News@lemmy.world•Freak sell-off of ‘safe haven’ US bonds raises fear that confidence in America is fading24·4 months agoPeople don’t trust the economy that can be toss back-and-forth with a single tweet? What a puzzler.
Ideonek@lemm.eeto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Is your phone secretly listening to you? Here's an easy way to find out11·3 months agoIt doesn’t. Mostly becouse it doesn’t have to. Your online behavior is easier accessible and a better predictor… (pretty bad over-all, but still better. Digital Marketing Bubble is bursting!)
Ok. Let’s take a step back
You have companies in Poland. Let’s call them A, B and C.
And we have company D in USA.
One of those A,B,C is a “child” of company D. Other two simply do business with company D.
Company D in they finacial statmet - that is a 3rd party statment that you have no rights to audit in any way, in some cases it want even be avaible to you - claim that they earned $10M from each A, B and C. (This is the “hearsay” becouse it’s an information form outside your bouble of control. You have no way of verifying it. US gov have, but they are 3rd party to you and company A, B and C)
A, B, and C each in their tax reports created for you claim that those $10M is their cost.
In case of one you say “no, it’s not your cost, it’s your profit”.
What specific difference between A, B, C makes you say that? One is similarly named to D? It won’t be, by next tax year. All all registered in Poland. All have polish board. All spand money at company D. What’s the difference? What parameter would you choose to tax one of those but not the other?
Ideonek@lemm.eeto News@lemmy.world•Elon Musk Rage Quits Livestream After Being Cyberbullied by Gamers13·4 months agoWorking theory is that you don’t get to his point by having morals.
Nice try, ad.