I mean… Are they right on top of this? The internet has only been around for… 40 years now?
Piracy has been a significant part of it for at least the last 30.
I dont want to sound like I’m justifying the lack of responses, but govt moves at the speed of govt, and it really doesn’t feel like anyone is really on piracy.
Reading comprehension… What even is it?
I do see that the light has mostly obscured a small band of blue so maybe its at a really neat phase of tarnish, but that’s speculation and this photo provides no evidence that is actually the case. Either way, I really dont think the tarnish article goes far to actually explain the blue aside from describing the mechanism.
That is a surprisingly not blue tarnish, if its supposed to explain what OP is showing us, if it makes a point, please help me comprehend.
I do see that the light has mostly obscured a small band of blue so maybe its at a really neat phase of tarnish, but that’s speculation and this photo provides no evidence that is actually the case. Either way, I really dont think the tarnish article goes far to actually explain the blue aside from describing the mechanism.
Pictures of tungsten tarnishing aren’t helpful when op is talking about silver. Stating “thank you, that’s the general idea yes, but I was trying to ask more specifically” isn’t an attack on you. You don’t need to defend yourself.
This implies that I am paying to access HA outside my network. I am not. You do not need any kind of subscription to access home assistant externally.
Lol, I guess a phrased that strangely. I’m not married to my cousin, but I have definitely been around some people who did.
This isn’t an “um actually,” simply a weird american thing that I’ve experienced but, marriage to your first cousin is not illegal here. Prolly should be, and you aren’t wrong about it being immigration fraud but still, if it was a real marriage, there wouldn’t be anything illegal about it.
Bruh, you can’t use this image without risk of legal consequences
Yeah, yeah you can, the heck? Parody, Fair use, and a variety of other options exist for the purpose described by the guy above you.
That said, you aren’t talking about that and I can’t help but feel like the guy you are responding to is acting in bad faith by intentionally misinterpreting what you are talking about, or they’re a useful idiot who doesn’t know what they are speaking about. Dismissing what they’re talking about is unhelpful. Either provide a context correct correction, or ignore them.
Simple. A good portion of our agriculture is based on capitalism. Prior to the industrial revolution (capitalism) there weren’t nation sized monoculture farms full of identical genetic freakshow plants.
Right, like how to end capitalism? I got very little, but I’m planting gardens, and not complaining that capitalism exists on /C/fuckcapitalism.
I appreciate you taking my question a face value, you’re the only one who did. Your capitalism quote worked perfectly. I was trying to use guns as my exams of shit I can’t get away from.
Your argument is invalid, the capitalists are making money. It will continue for as long as there is money to be made. Your agreement and my agreement is unnecessary.
How do we fix the problem that makes AI something that we have to deal with.
The way they were trained is the way they were trained.
I dont mean to say that the ethics dont matter, but you are talking as though this isnt already present tense.
The only way to go back is basically a global EMP.
What so you actually propose that is a realistic response?
This is an actual question. To this point the only advice I’ve seen to come from the anti-ai crowd is “dont use it. Its bad!” And that is simply not practical.
You all sound like the people who think we are actually able to get rid of guns entirely.
That sounds familiar. I bet she’s trying to get you to build a cat calorie counter.