I hate when people “show you how to do it”, they’re always showing you the back of their hand, like that’s supposed to help.

How is this a personal weakness?

Wrong answers only, please.

How do you know?

I don’t understand. The artist also has blue eyes.

What do you define as “sticky note”?

You could use Standard Notes and leave the window open. It syncs between desktop and Android.

I switched to something else a long time ago, but because I preferred FOSS, not because it was a bad app.

Wait, they’re canonically not big titty tweenagers?!

One punch man characters in the anime2 version:

Yuri often translates to All of the above.

How real is the dynamic of girls getting “saved” from being hit on in public by their not-boyfriends?

Does the pickup ever actually work?

Do girls actually squee at being claimed?

It seems so very “and then everyone clapped,” but Japan is a whole different culture, so I wouldn’t know.

The “1k retweet, 10k heart” implies the artist is going to do something once those conditions are met.

I predict 1000 (mostly useless) things a day: the weather, coworker conversation topics, the next presidential scandal, etc…

But I only remember the big ones. Or the silly ones.

I’m still wrong most of the time.

This is why I do not gamble.

This seems wholesome enough. I know swimsuits are a thing in Japan, but does that warrant the Lewd Blur?

My brain autocorrected so hard I didn’t realize it was wrong until this comment.

After blowing up the aid trucks.

We did not blow up an aid truck. We blew up terrorists.

After evidence comes out that, yes, it was an aid truck.

Well, they did not properly identify themselves as an aid truck.

Video evidence comes out that they identified themselves on the truck, with their uniforms, and during direct conversation with the soldiers who then killed them anyway.

One of the aid workers was totally a terrorist. He was hiding a bomb in his underpants, we swear!

Everyone knows this is an obvious lie.

And what are you going go do about it? Tweet at us?

In an analysis of human exposure to climate change extremes — such as heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, cyclones and crop failures — researchers found that children born in 2020 are two to seven times more likely to face one-in-10,000 year events than those who were born in 1960.

Why pick (great) grandparents as the reference point?

Wouldn’t it be more practical to compare them with their parents?

Edit: the actual study does show comparative data for other cohorts (i.e. every decade since 1960). Unless the average LiveScience reader is in their 60s, they just picked a weirdly unrelatable way to describe the study.

Serbian prosecutors on May 14 announced that the cultural official in charge of the site’s historic designation had forged a key document and had been arrested. Goran Vasic, the acting director of the Republic Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, admitted he had fabricated an expert’s opinion.

“Vasic forged a proposal for a decision to revoke the status of cultural property,” prosecutors said in a statement.

So they forged a document in order to un-protect the building site?

I want to be sympathetic, but… even if she voted for him because he promised to only deport the serious criminals… what about the everything else he promised? What about his track record on just about any promise he’s ever made?