

Good!
Good!
This is the point I don’t really get, if their licence is days away from issue anyway why would Reeves meeting with them be a problem?
Because financial institutions, including the BoE have a lot more on the line, and need to keep reputational appearance even if politicians don’t care because they will be out on the streets before the next election.
What’s Reeves hoping to gain from this, while making claims of “cutting red tape”? It sounds like simple political interference, and as such she can fuck off.
Generally the BoE makes a lot of sense, and I don’t see anything here that would change my position. I haven’t seen whether Revolut has had their licence upgraded from limited yet, but that has to be due any day now that they’ve had their 1 year limited trial to prove operations.
When you are dealing with peoples money, I don’t want these things to get rushed, and Reeves saying things like
Reeves has placed cutting red-tape on the financial services sector and other industries at the heart of her mission to turbocharge the UK’s faltering economy and has blamed over-cautious watchdogs for holding back growth.
Financial services is doing great. Probably one of the best performing parts of the UK, why don’t you concentrate on literally anything else, like taxing unearned income?
There are a lot of Euro financial initiatives that the UK financial services drive and adopt, such as Open Banking and Open Finance.
Don’t mistake the UK being outside of the EU with Financial Services in the UK, they see big picture plans and generally ignore the smaller petty politics.
In this case, as Wero gets adopted, it’s in their best interests to support it otherwise there is a risk that customers would not be able to purchase when travelling and what’s the point of adopting that risk when you could just support it?
There is the point where if the person had valid identification, and National Insurance, and was paid via HMRC, that the onus should be on notifying the business of a change of status. Whether that’s the student or HMRC I don’t know. They would notify the business on a change of required tax.
Its been ongoing in Birmingham for a long time.
https://www.business-live.co.uk/economic-development/birmingham-binmen-earn-up-45000-3924252
There have been several scams over the decades, which put the council into bankruptcy. A Union isn’t going to ever accept a potential paycut, so they are stuck.
Waste collection doesn’t want to be scheduled for the full 32 hours they are contracted so they can collect the overtime, and the council don’t want to pay overtime for people working their normal hours. The only thing the council can do is cut the folks being paid the most, but the Union won’t let that happen either.
Just increase council tax in Birmingham and separate out the waste disposal as a line item so that the people can see where their money is going.
There are 28 million families in the UK. [1]
Your article implies there are 25 million houses and 1 million is empty. [2]
The empty houses in the photos are not suitable for living in and should be condemned if they haven’t already. Rebuilding a mid-terrace house is not simple and even after blow all of that we managed 1 million out of the 4 million required to at least have one home per family. That sounds like a terrible plan to work on the most expensive work and ultimately not make a dent in the issue.
[2] https://www.actiononemptyhomes.org/why-empty-homes-matter
Once again, LibDems giving the sane point of view.
https://labour.org.uk/change/break-down-barriers-to-opportunity/#respect
We will also modernise, simplify, and reform the intrusive and outdated gender recognition law to a new process. We will remove indignities for trans people who deserve recognition and acceptance;
Hmm.
Its only an imaginary standard because its not been set further than “we should require people to learn some English”.
We have plently of standards in schools throughout the so thats not the hard part.
Now its not anything I would touch because of the level of racists that attach themselves to this “issue”.
Which turned out to be not very big.
Additionally, 1.5% (880,000) could not speak English well, and a small percentage (0.3%, 161,000) of the overall population could not speak English at all.
161k people don’t speak English? That sounds like a solvable problem, as thats not very many at all. The question would be how to identify them, and help them? My personal experience is generally elderly parents who have been brought here by someone acting as a carer, which puts it back firmly in “unsolvable”. If they haven’t already learnt it, and aren’t necessarily here though choice, its going to be a challenge.
Knowing our current government though, it would probably be by copying Trump and sending the military door to door to ask everyone a simple English language puzzle.
Citation for a kid in the UK getting shot by the police for kicking a ball at a “no ball games” sign please.
Weren’t you in power over those 10 years?
Surely you should have done something about it rather than waiting until now to complain.
deleted by creator
That was a terrible video that doesnt explain your points.
lack of accountability
How so? Thats just a transparency issue, if we know that 50% of the Labour votes were originally Green votes then that definitely sets a tone.
That would require a massive reworking of how our system works, wouldn’t it?
Couldn’t just ranked choice fix the majority of the issues with voting?
deleted by creator
Sgt. Kabukiman NYPD proved that.
For those of you who think it sounds weird, it’s not an uncommon practice as it is basically the same as Most Favoured Nation policy that a lot of industries use.
You get paid the amount requested, unless someone requests more (and its agreed to) and you automatically get paid that much.
I wonder if they are going to change the stupid system of pumping money into failing schools until the are “outstanding” and then slowly reduce funding because they obviously don’t need it, until the school is failing again…