Ironic coming from the one of the biggest mouthpieces of disinformation.

Take this, you deserve it: 🏆

deleted by creator

Spell-check did though.

Tell that to the people that say AI will be doing all of our jobs in 5 years.

So were start with the fact that 2+2=5 and build our glorious new science up from there.

Yes

These things will get qualified immunity for all their actions.

I mean, it’s the same thing but now the process will become automated and more efficient.

Techbros are racing each other to create a better Torment Nexus. Dystopia Sci-Fi is just current events and we’ve learned nothing.

Why go through the trouble of forging evidence yourself when you can have the computer do it for you?

How long before an AI hallucination sends someone to the gulag?

I’m sure that’s just an unexpected bonus of this tech.

Lol AI==VaaS(Vulnerability as a Service)

I’ll say that while it is a problem that LLM are plagiarism machines at industrial scales, It’s also a problem that it would create the same carbon emissions as NYC produces in a month to make them plagiarize 3-5% better.

And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s

He’s one of the world’s wealthiest men. That hair is a conscious decision.

Also, Palantir, as a Tolkien reference, is too on the nose. The good guys don’t use the Palantir because of who else may be listening in. We’re so mask-off at this point you might as well call this company “The Eye of Sauron”

He’s one of the world’s wealthiest men. That hair is a conscious decision.

But it is a skill issue, just UI/UX design skill. Not software development skill.

We are already there. Just look at the state of society right now and observe the critical thinking and media literacy skills of the average person.

In the words of cyberpunk author Wiilam Gibson: “The future is already here – it’s just not very evenly distributed.“

Anywhere I’ve actually seen it used , assembler and assembly were pretty much interchangeable. Assembly code is probably technically correct, but you could be writing code for the assembler so nobody will actually be confused. Per your example, you might say “I wrote code in MASM,” to reference a specific assembler. Again nobody that’s actually worked with any of this would bat an eye at the usage.