…but not for a different party? That kinda defeats the purpose of voting imo

Oops – I meant 367!

I think the problem was that you wrote a comment that wasn’t understandable

I think the question is usually frames as “how many people does it take to make it at least 50% likely that two people will share a birthday”, or more likely than not etc.

A guarantee would need 366 people. But most people are satisfied with “more likely than not”, “90% chance”, or “99% chance”.

EDIT: I meant 367, not 366!

Workers throwing off their chains of the right to vote?

They’re sensitive to different things

Hah! That’s what she said. Poor her.

As someone who worked retail, I can’t condone this.

Walmart isn’t eating the loss so much as it is…

• Raising prices to compensate
• Punishing staff (up to and including firing) for not lowering “loss” enough
• Potentially building a case against people who steal frequent (since there are people who have and brag about these habits besides you)

I think everybody misunderstood what you meant by “fake Video game” and I’m still a bit unsure myself, lol

Browsers don’t know how to handle 80085

Their hardware is too expensive even with this subsidizing it

The commenter you replied to seems to be suggesting that the spying still happens

Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good

When did you see the most activity here?

Disc Golf

Yeah, eat them before you come in.

Or keep them in your car to consume during your lunch break.

EDIT: Do not eat edibles and then drive. Leave your car at work and Uber home in scenario B

Call them to say I found a better job.

No, I don’t show up. Just call at the exact time the interview starts.

If that were enough, I imagine somebody would’ve done it already

This isn’t “clear evidence” of what you’re claiming.

That’s like someone saying “I ate some fries yesterday” and concluding “That’s clear evidence you went to McDonalds”

Ah, great point!