slackassassin

North Carolina come on and raise up take your shirt off, twist it 'round your hand, spin it like a helicopter.

It sure sounded like you misunderstood. But yes, killing kids is bad.

The warning sirens were expected from the base not to the base. Jfc.

Great write up. These are the steps that make adoption “difficult”. Not that it’s hard, per se, explained very well here in fact. But these are steps that aren’t necessary on more commonly used networks. Having to explain that “all” is not actually “all” always feels wonky.

Well, it is still using entanglement. It’s just not using it to transmit the data. More like a checksum.

Fugazi

The fiber is there because the data is being sent through the fiber as photons like usual. There is no zero latency happening at all and it will not allow rovers to be controlled remotely in real time. That would break causality. This has more to do with encryption and the inability to wiretap without detection.

Been working great for my group. I think the criticism for the open source options is over played. And so is the monetization angle for creators with fluxer, avenues for that bridges a lot of gaps for adoption.

That’s a really weird thing to say because you posted a source that provided statistics beyond the military survey, which pointedly proved that statement false.

Then you denied saying that the military was the only source when that fact was pointed out.

But you are now trippling down on that false claim.

It seems like you might have the inability to admit fault and truly apologize. Which is also what you accused others of.

Might be time to take a break and question some preconceived notions. Like, no hate. You are on one right now. 20 percent of people are not who you think they are. It’s probably healthy to realize that.

I am a detractor who read these sources. You can too if you have any interest in the subject.

The first one does not mention statistics at all, just describes why you shouldn’t call people narcisistits because it has a specific definition that is overly applied. Ironically enough.

The second source does mention some statistics. But actually verifies the questions that were raised by other curious folks. It states that only .5 percent of the population experiences NPD and that 20 percent of the military does.

This verifies that the military survey is NOT the only source of statistics and that 20 percent of every one you meet doesn’t necessarily “lack empathy”.

So, a relief, I suppose, for now.

Although, the claim that anyone who questions a random internet comment are all the same person and are definitely controlling narcissistic a holes has not been verified.

But it’s probably true. I will not look any further into it for fear of self reflection.

Yes you did, it was like a big point you made and doubled down on. But ok.

That source didn’t verify that claim, either. And the other source doesn’t mention statistics at all.

Nevertheless, you are right that goodbyes are in order.

First source says .5 percent of the population and 20 percent of the military. Which is exactly what you were questioned about.

1. The military is a biased sample.

2. The military is not the only source of statistics.

Also, kind of a shit source that doesn’t appear to reference anything, to be fair.

Three " ‘people’ " huh. That seem to suggest a lack of empathy towards anyone who applies a minimum amount critical thinking.

No one should take a claim like that at face value, period. If there is some evidence for it then the burden of proof is on those who make the claim, not the other way around.

Must be a part of that 20 percent to dehumanize anyone who questions you so easily. Maybe there is some truth to the claim after all.

Until then I will remained convinced that 20 percent of the entire human population is some quantified amount of psychopathic.

Cool cool. And how does this source you wish you could find about a biased sample of the public, the only one possible of course, quantify “lacks empathy”.

Not to mention that “lacks empathy” isn’t exactly quantifiable in a meaningful way without further qualification.

The only place to get an accurate number on this thing you should totally believe about everyone you meet is a test that the military definitely doesn’t give to everyone but can maybe be sourced probably.

Fwiw, it’s really refreshing to see this acknowledged.

Broken people breaking societies

Naw, people love saying shit like that about large groups of people.