Tt;dr

Seek therapy instead of trying to get it out of Lemmy comments.

No, it was a side argument regarding mental health. Fixing mental health is an everybody issue, especially when people are products of their environment. Having a healthy sex life is part and parcel of improving mental health, on top of exercise, a good diet and actually handling or leaving toxic environments.

You’re not able to see my main point because you want people to suffer, because you think they deserve to suffer, because you want to feel superior and calling me an asshole indirectly at the same time because you’re too much of a pussy to tell me directly.

So the only asshole I see here is you.

They’ll remind isolated with weakened impulse control because of ignoring their mental health - which is the problem I was eluding to.

But hey, your cathardic Schadenfreude is all that matters. I wonder what that says about you.

Sex work should be subject to protections under the law, including the law, the courts and the healthcare system - rather than subject to persecution, ostracization and having to fend for themselves outside of the law. They’d rather want sex motels decked with panic buttons and security on guard.

Think before you assume you’re actually concerned for someone’s well being, and if you think continued illegality will somehow eradicate sex work - let me remind you that it hasn’t worked thus far. Please reconsider your stance.

Therapy will though, which is why framing and semantics are important.

Then again, I’m a humanist. I humanize.

Incel is just a pejorative that makes them get even more blackpilled. Use “emotionally unstable” or even “constitutionally weak”, because if they knew the real issue, they’d be more predisposed to actually fixing themselves so that they can also get laid.

Also, legalize sex work. Just get them laid. Watch the alt right and fascism crash harder than a drunk driver speeding at night.

AMD is awesome ^^ they’ll rule the land of x86 for quire some while imho. But the problem of supporting hegemony is obvious.

AMDs upcoming GPUs are purportedly on par with NVIDIAs Maxwell, but as long as the prices are the same, we’re in the same boat.

Luckily the prices have been falling, largely because NPUs are replacing GPUs as the primary handler of AI workloads - since it’s more performative and saves on electricity costs.

But, in a “free market” competition mui importante.

Haha this was a great time for me to dump Google Photos for Jottacloud.

Your data will then be stored in Norway and it’s like 13$ for unlimited storage (with the caveat of bandwidth being throttled if you have more than 5TB).

But still, $13 for 5TB is a lot - and that jurisdiction? Hoo boy. My rights are safe, at least.

…okay, so invest in Chinese GPU companies? Invest in Chinese GPU companies.

Invest in metal stoves and big tents today!

…is this some sort of joke my Nordic brain can’t understand? I need to go hug a councilman.

Dumb as I am, I have a Pixel… the good thing though? Graphene OS is an option.

Oh thank God.

Why are you people so bad at reading, or are you just trying to misdirect?

You either missed the point entirely - or you’re trying to ignore it. But that’s why we use simple language and conveyance to dismiss such tomfoolery.

Pure ethanol… right? Pure ethanol is illegal to sell as a beverage. With me so far? But ethanol… is the effective ingredient in alcohol. Understood? Good.

You keeping a bottle and drinking it… is not the same as distributing it as a beverage in say a store, a bar, your grandma’s house, etc… Yes? We can’t make it illegal for you - that’s you in your private home - to destroy your body by drinking it yourself. Agreed?

But… if you then… go give that bottle to someone without informing them “hey bro, this is pure ethanol - this shit’ll burn your cornia”, and by neglecting to do so, they go blind when drinking it? That’s what we call wilful negligence - in legal speak.

If you do that, then you deserve time in prison for wilful negligence and causing bodily harm to someone. Right?

Or… are you some sort of psychopath? Or perhaps a libertarian? I’m a socialist libertarian, so let me know if you need to learn something about why law is still important and why causing harm to others - be it intentional or not - should be illegal. Here’s a hint: we still need licenses for running major industrial machinery for a reason.

This is precedent now. Wheeeeeeeee common law system.

Allow me to hit back. No. But by that token pure ethanol that can make you go blind should also be sold over the counter, right?

It sort of is a “nanny state”… or a welfare state. In any case, its to prevent deaths caused by dehydration. 60 is allowed, but everything upwards is not.

It’s really bad if the wrong person gets a hold of it too. Suddenly latent psychosis gets triggered - which could have been healed by itself over the years, but instead destroys a life that then will become a burden to their family and the welfare system. It’s also what could lead us right back to criminalization.

Most of the irresponsible stoners in this thread don’t get that, because that care only about themselves, but as a civilized society we can’t just let that stuff run rampant.

Grow… it… yourself… but do not distribute WITHOUT… informing… of THC content…

Got that, cookie? Does it enter into your skull? Do you understand why? Of course not.

Do you ignore the article because it doesn’t suit your agenda? Yes. Are you a licensed neurologist? No. Are you a licensed therapist? No. Do you understand why it’s a problem? No. Do you care? No. Are you a selfish little goblin? Yes…

They could grow it themselves and not distribute it without telling people what it contained…

This is why high grade is bad, because it impedes ones reading retention - apparently.