Yeah

I gotta ask, would you consider humans intelligent?

I mean the entire scientific method depends on the deterministic nature of the universe, arguably making everything ever to follow manually coded instructions.

Just break it down logically,

Would you consider something capable of playing minesweeper intelligent? (ie do you think it has a higher level of understanding than pure random chance?)

Do you consider software running on a manufactured silicon chip natural or artificial?

It was actually the 50s, commonly attributed to John McCarthy.

Crazy its been around almost a century at this point

The term is probably older than you.

We could also use a model or 2 trained on ethical data.

Until then its pretty easy to argue all ai is unethical.

Heres the biggest and most active I could quickly find, but I believe the XKCD in that repo inspired a handful of similar projects

Its cool to see this xkcd in action.

That being said theres a couple options out here attempting the same thing, but due to the required level of trust youre fighting a bit of an uphill battle for widespread adoption.

Not that this changes how cool of a tool it is and valuable for you use case!

SIMD Might be the term youre looking for (Single Input Multiple Data)

Can’t fake googles key signature

I’d assume they’d put these pretty close to the surface, lowers the water pressure and makes it more accessible

JK Rowling🤢

The mentioned guix or more popular nixos arguably handle this better than traditional distros

GCVE is more confusing if anything

From a comment on the article

I love compression, I love ffmpeg and I love more performance, but… FFV1 is ffmpegs own, old lossless compression format for archival purposes. It is not particularly bad, but it is also not particularly good or modern.

Just lost wmr to windows updates too, I’d expect more shit like this now that theyre better monopolized

Kinda feel like they said something like

“I think everyone should have food”

And you responded with

“you want a Walmart on every block in the world?? do you even know the environmental impact that will have? Poor people are really to blame anyways because they’re not voting with their wallets enough”

How an asshole can mess something up is entirely independent of how a proper implementation might not mess up

Edit to say: I think this is what they meant in their comment about (American) capitalist propaganda; You dont realise your implicit bias enforcing that it must be a capitalist implementing it without any external input.

To the rest of the world he’s just an infamous citizen in a dying country, who would never realistically have 1/10th the pull needed to enforce that BS internationally; by starting the conversation at best he’d speed up external implementations.

You looked into flatpaks?

They work using namespaces and cgroups like containers, but have a much more unified system than podman/docker

I mean I imagine an LLM is able to generate more entropy from the sheer computing power put into it, but I agree traditional digital stenography methods are MUCH more cost/power efficient than an LLM.

(Not even to mention the amount of cyclic redundancy youd probably need just to get a message across)

Depending on the environment I suppose texr-based could be beneficial vs (relatively) large media files

I could honestly see this as one of the few legit uses for LLMs.

Throw some data ino it and make some “natural text” to obfuscate it.