Epstein Files Jan 30, 2026

Data hoarders on reddit have been hard at work archiving the latest Epstein Files release from the U.S. Department of Justice. Below is a compilation of their work with download links.

Please seed all torrent files to distribute and preserve this data.

Ref: https://old.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1qrk3qk/epstein_files_datasets_9_10_11_300_gb_lets_keep/

Epstein Files Data Sets 1-8: INTERNET ARCHIVE LINK

Epstein Files Data Set 1 (2.47 GB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 2 (631.6 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 3 (599.4 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 4 (358.4 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 5: (61.5 MB) TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 6 (53.0 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 7 (98.2 MB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK
Epstein Files Data Set 8 (10.67 GB): TORRENT MAGNET LINK


Epstein Files Data Set 9 (Incomplete). Only contains 49 GB of 180 GB. Multiple reports of cutoff from DOJ server at offset 48995762176.

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

/u/susadmin’s More Complete Data Set 9 (96.25 GB)
De-duplicated merger of (45.63 GB + 86.74 GB) versions

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

Epstein Files Data Set 10 (78.64GB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

  • TORRENT MAGNET LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)
  • INTERNET ARCHIVE FOLDER (removed due to reports of CSAM)
  • INTERNET ARCHIVE DIRECT LINK (removed due to reports of CSAM)

Epstein Files Data Set 11 (25.55GB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

SHA1: 574950c0f86765e897268834ac6ef38b370cad2a


Epstein Files Data Set 12 (114.1 MB)

ORIGINAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LINK

SHA1: 20f804ab55687c957fd249cd0d417d5fe7438281
MD5: b1206186332bb1af021e86d68468f9fe
SHA256: b5314b7efca98e25d8b35e4b7fac3ebb3ca2e6cfd0937aa2300ca8b71543bbe2


This list will be edited as more data becomes available, particularly with regard to Data Set 9 (EDIT: NOT ANYMORE)


EDIT [2026-02-02]: After being made aware of potential CSAM in the original Data Set 9 releases and seeing confirmation in the New York Times, I will no longer support any effort to maintain links to archives of it. There is suspicion of CSAM in Data Set 10 as well. I am removing links to both archives.

Some in this thread may be upset by this action. It is right to be distrustful of a government that has not shown signs of integrity. However, I do trust journalists who hold the government accountable.

I am abandoning this project and removing any links to content that commenters here and on reddit have suggested may contain CSAM.

Ref 1: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html
Ref 2: https://www.404media.co/doj-released-unredacted-nude-images-in-epstein-files

    • DigitalForensick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can work on a script that crawls/detects which of these files are like this. I looked at the hexadecimal data of one of the examples from the reddit thread and there might be some indicators. I wasnt able to get a video to plat, but

      Just from this file I can see that they created/edited these pdfs using something called reportlab.com, edited on 12/23/2025. Theres also some text refering to Kids? “Count 1/ Kids [ 3 0 R ]” This is odd. screenshot

      File EFTS0024813.pdf/mp4? (Dataset 8, folder 0005)

      • StinkyFred@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I assume you mean EFTA00024813?

        If so while it doesn’t show on the website it is included in dataset 8 if you just download the complete set.

        It is a .xlsx file.

        Its in DataSet 8\VOL00008\NATIVES\0001

        This is the case for most of these files, dataset 9 might be missing a few though.

  • internauta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    someone on reddit ( u/FuckThisSite3 ) posted a more complete DataSet 9:

    I assembled a tar file with all I got from dataset-9.

    Magnet link: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:5b50564ee995a54009fec387c97f9465eb18ba00&dn=dataset-9_by_fuckthissite3.tar&xl=148072017920

    SHA256: 5adc043bcf94304024d718e57267c1aa009d782835f6adbe6ad7fdbb763f15c5

    The tar contains 254,477 files which is 148072017920 bytes (148.07GB/137.9GiB)

    • ZaInT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Seeding 1 node, 3 on the way EDIT: 3 running, 4th one planned to be temporary but should soon be up

    • locke1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      While it’s bigger in size, this one seems to be missing a ton of files? I grabbed the earlier collections and my file count is at 531,256. I’ll have to compare when I finish downloading.

  • susadmin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I’m in the process of downloading both dataset 9 torrents (45.63 GB + 86.74 GB). I will then compare the filenames in both versions (the 45.63GB version has 201,358 files alone), note any duplicates, and merge all unique files into one folder. I’ll upload that as a torrent once it’s done so we can get closer to a complete dataset 9 as one file.

    • Edit 31Jan2026 816pm EST - Making progress. I finished downloading both dataset 9s (45.6 GB and the 86.74 GB). The 45.6GB set is 200,000 files and the 86GB set is 500,000 files. I have a .csv of the filenames and sizes of all files in the 45.6GB version. I’m creating the same .csv for the 86GB version now.

    • Edit 31Jan2026 845pm EST -

      • dataset 9 (45.63 GB) = 201357 files
      • dataset 9 (86.74 GB) = 531257 files

      I did an exact filename combined with an exact file size comparison between the two dataset9 versions. I also did an exact filename combined with a fuzzy file size comparison (tolerance of +/- 1KB) between the two dataset9 versions. There were:

      • 201330 exact matches
      • 201330 fuzzy matches (+/- 1KB)

      Meaning there are 201330 duplicate files between the two dataset9 versions.

      These matches were written to a duplicates file. Then, from each dataset9 version, all files/sizes matching the file and size listed in the duplicates file will be moved to a subfolder. Then I’ll merge both parent folders into one enormous folder containing all unique files and a folder of duplicates. Finally, compress it, make a torrent, and upload it.


    • Edit 31Jan2026 945pm EST -

      Still moving duplicates into subfolders.


    • Edit 31Jan2026 1027pm EST -

      Going off of xodoh74984’s comment (https://lemmy.world/post/42440468/21884588), I’m increasing the rigor of my determination of whether the files that share a filename and size between both version of dataset9 are in fact duplicates. This will be identical to rsync --checksum to verify bit-for-bit that the files are the same by calculating their MD5 hash. This will take a while but is the best way.


    • Edit 01Feb2026 1227am EST -

      Checksum comparison complete. 73 files found that have the same file name and size but different content. Total number of duplicate files = 201257. Merging both dataset versions now, while keeping one subfolder of the duplicates, so nothing is deleted.


    • Edit 01Feb2026 1258am EST -

      Creating the .tar.zst file now. 531285 total files, which includes all unique files between dataset9 (45.6GB) and dataset9 (86.7GB), as well as a subfolder containing the files that were found in both dataset9 versions.


    • Edit 01Feb2026 215am EST -

      I was using wayyyy to high a compression value for no reason (ztsd --ultra --22). Restarted the .tar.zst file creation (with ztsd -12) and it’s going 100x faster now. Should be finished within the hour


    • Edit 01Feb2026 311am EST -

      .tar.zst file creation is taking very long. I’m going to let it run overnight - will check back in a few hours. I’m tired boss.


    • EDIT 01Feb2026 831am EST -

    COMPLETE!

    And then I doxxed myself in the torrent. One moment please while I fix that…


    Final magnet link is HERE. GO GO GOOOOOO

    I’m seeding @ 55 MB/s. I’m also trying to get into the new r/EpsteinPublicDatasets subreddit to share the torrent there.

    • epstein_files_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      looking forward to your torrent, will seed.

      I have several incomplete sets of files from dataset 9 that I downloaded with a scraped set of urls - should I try to get them to you to compare as well?

      • susadmin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yes! I’m not sure the best way to do that - upload them to MEGA and message me a download link?

        • epstein_files_guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 days ago

          maybe archive.org? that way they can be torrented if others want to attempt their own merging techniques? either way it will be a long upload, my speed is not especially good. I’m still churning through one set of urls that is 1.2M lines, most are failing but I have 65k from that batch so far.

            • epstein_files_guy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I’ll get the first set (42k files in 31G) uploading as soon as I get it zipped up. it’s the one least likely to have any new files in it since I started at the beginning like others but it’s worth a shot

              edit 01FEB2026 1208AM EST - 6.4/30gb uploaded to archive.org

              edit 01FEB2026 0430AM EST - 13/30gb uploaded to archive.org; scrape using a different url set going backwards is currently at 75.4k files

              edit 01FEB2026 1233PM EST - had an internet outage overnight and lost all progress on the archive.org upload, currently back to 11/30gb. the scrape using a previous url set seems to be getting very few new files now, sitting at 77.9k at the moment

    • thetrekkersparky@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m downloading 8-11 now, I’m seeding 1-7+12 now. I’ve tried checking up on reddit, but every other time i check in the post is nuked or something. My home server never goes down and I’m outside USA. I’m working on the 100GB+ #9 right now and I’ll seed whatever you can get up here too.

    • helpingidiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Have a good night. I’ll be waiting to download it, seed it, make hardcopies and redistribute it.

      Please check back in with us

    • xodoh74984@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      When merging versions of Data Set 9, is there any risk of loss with simply using rsync --checksum to dump all files into one directory?

      • susadmin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        rsync --checksum is better than my file name + file size comparison, since you are calculating the hash of each file and comparing it to the hash all other files. For example, if there is a file called data1.pdf with size 1024 bytes in dataset9-v1, and another file called data1.pdf with size 1024 bytes in dataset9-v2, but their content is different, my method will still detect them as identical files.

        I’m going to modify my script to calculate and compare the hashes of all files that I previously determined to be duplicates. If the hashes of the duplicates in dataset9 (45GB torrent) match the hashes of the duplicates in dataset9 (86GB torrent), then they are in fact duplicates between the two datasets.

        • xodoh74984@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Amazing, thank you. That was my thought, check hashes while merging the files to keep any copies that might have been modified by DOJ and discard duplicates even if the duplicates have different metadata, e.g. timestamps.

      • GorillaCall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        anyone have the original 186gb magnet link from that thread? someone said reddit keeps nuking it because it implicates reddit admins like spez

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is it, encoded in base 64 format, according to the comment:

          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

    • ModernSimian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Be prepared to wait a while… idk why this person chose xz, it is so slow. I’ve been just trying to get the tarball out for an hour.

  • jankscripts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 days ago

    Heads up that the DOJ site is a tar pit, it’s going to return 50 files on the page regardless of the page number your on seems like somewhere between 2k-5k pages it just wraps around right now.

    Testing page 2000... ✓ 50 new files (out of 50)
    Testing page 5000... ○ 0 new files - all duplicates
    Testing page 10000... ○ 0 new files - all duplicates
    Testing page 20000... ○ 0 new files - all duplicates
    Testing page 50000... ○ 0 new files - all duplicates
    Testing page 100000... ○ 0 new files - all duplicates

    • WorldlyBasis9838@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      I saw this too; yesterday I tried manually accessing the page to explore just how many there are. Seems like some of the pages are duplicates (I was simply comparing the last listed file name and content between some of the first 10 pages, and even had 1-2 duplications.)

      Far as maximum page number goes, if you use the query parameter ?page=200000000 it will still resolve a list of files. — actually crazy.

      https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-disclosures/data-set-9-files?page=200000000

    • jankscripts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      The last page I got a non-duplicate URL from was 10853 which curiously only had 36 URLs on page. When I browsed directly to page 10853 36 URLs were displayed but then moving back and forth in the page count the tar pit logic must have re-looped there and it went back to 50 Displayed. I ended with 224751 URLs

  • hYcG68caGB7WvLX67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 days ago

    I was quick to download dataset 12 after it was discovered to exist, and apparently my dataset 12 contains some files that were later removed. Uploaded to IA in case it contains anything that later archivists missed. https://archive.org/details/data-set-12_202602

    Specifically doc number 2731361 and others around it were at some point later removed from DoJ, but are still within this early-download DS12. Maybe more, unsure

    • susadmin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      The files in this (early) dataset 12 are identical to the dataset 12 here, which is the link in the OP. The MD5 hashes are identical.

      I shared a .csv file of the calculated MD5 hashes here

  • bile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 days ago

    reposting a full magnet list (besides 9) of all the datasets that was on reddit with healthy seeds:

    Dataset 1 (2.47GB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4e2fd3707919bebc3177e85498d67cb7474bfd96&dn=DataSet+1&xl=2658494752&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 2 (631.6MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:d3ec6b3ea50ddbcf8b6f404f419adc584964418a&dn=DataSet+2&xl=662334369&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 3 (599.4MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:27704fe736090510aa9f314f5854691d905d1ff3&dn=DataSet+3&xl=628519331&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 4 (358.4MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4be48044be0e10f719d0de341b7a47ea3e8c3c1a&dn=DataSet+4&xl=375905556&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 5 (61.5MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1deb0669aca054c313493d5f3bf48eed89907470&dn=DataSet+5&xl=64579973&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 6 (53.0MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:05e7b8aefd91cefcbe28a8788d3ad4a0db47d5e2&dn=DataSet+6&xl=55600717&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 7 (98.2MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:bcd8ec2e697b446661921a729b8c92b689df0360&dn=DataSet+7&xl=103060624&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 8 (10.67GB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c3a522d6810ee717a2c7e2ef705163e297d34b72&dn=DataSet%208&xl=11465535175&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeking.me%3A6969%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 10 (78.64GB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:d509cc4ca1a415a9ba3b6cb920f67c44aed7fe1f&dn=DataSet%2010.zip&xl=84439381640
    

    Dataset 11 (25.55GB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:59975667f8bdd5baf9945b0e2db8a57d52d32957&xt=urn:btmh:12200ab9e7614c13695fe17c71baedec717b6294a34dfa243a614602b87ec06453ad&dn=DataSet%2011.zip&xl=27441913130&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fopen.tracker.cl%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.srv00.com%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.filemail.com%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.dler.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker-udp.gbitt.info%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Frun.publictracker.xyz%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.dstud.io%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fleet-tracker.moe%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=https%3A%2F%2Ftracker.zhuqiy.com%3A443%2Fannounce&tr=https%3A%2F%2Ftracker.pmman.tech%3A443%2Fannounce&tr=https%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moeblog.cn%3A443%2Fannounce&tr=https%3A%2F%2Ftracker.alaskantf.com%3A443%2Fannounce&tr=https%3A%2F%2Fshahidrazi.online%3A443%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.torrentsnipe.info%3A2701%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.genesis-sp.org%3A2710%2Fannounce
    

    Dataset 12 (114.0MB)

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:EE6D2CE5B222B028173E4DEDC6F74F08AFBBB7A3&dn=DataSet%2012.zip&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.opentrackr.org%3a1337%2fannounce
    
    • xodoh74984@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      Thank you for this!

      I’ve added all magnet links for sets 1-8 to the original post. Magnet links for 9-11 match OP. Magnet link for 12 is different, but we’ve identified that there are at least two versions. DOJ removed files before the second version was downloaded. OP contains the early version of data set 12.

  • ModernSimian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Does anyone have an index of filenames/links from the DOJ website scraped?

    Edit, specifically for DataSet 9.

  • Wild_Cow_5769@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 days ago

    As far as CSAM and the “don’t go looking for data set 9”…

    Look I’ll be straight up.

    If I find any CSAM it gets deleted…

    But if you believe for 1 second that DOJ didn’t remove delete relevant files because they are protecting people then I have a time share to sell you at a cheap price on a beautiful scenic swamp in Florida…

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s literally left-in on purpose to try to have something over people that download and/or seed the torrents. We need a file-list to know what not to dl/seed, or a new torrent for that set.