• CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You got to love this. The Pentagon just failed its 7th audit in a row. It has a budget of $1tr. And yet the cost savings team decides that penny pinching by making life harder for workers is where the real savings are to be found. Not the giant black hole of finance which is the military industrial complex.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’ve gotta look at it from the perspective of a poor multibillionaire who desperately needs to buy his fifth superyatch so he can work his five CEO jobs remotely

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Noooo shhhhh, we’re not supposed to talk about HOW THE PENTAGON HAS NEVER PASSED AN AUDIT. We’re supposed to be talking about the border, come on people, get it together.

    • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s interesting they have multiple offices. Offices they’re already not in. If there was a time for a general strike it is forever ago.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let the managers decide, then.

        If we won’t let logic or evidence do it, at least the people working directly with their teams and having to deal with them should do it.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The Deep State appreciates your hard work, know how, and dedication. Come work for us from home and help stymie the Shallow State”

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then they aren’t really about efficiency, are they? When properly set up, WFH for office work is very effective and efficient.

    • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      they already said it themselves: “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome” so no, it was never about efficiency. at all.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t you love when someone from outside talks big shit pretending to know what YOUR job is and determining its not needed?

        Almost like firing people based on code written didn’t backfire last time…

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But think of the billions of dollars of now unused office space. That’s horrible for real estate pricing, which is where many of these fucks are invested.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even a real estate issue sometimes. I worked in an office in an industrial facility- printing custom boxes. Everyone in an office job was on a hybrid schedule. No one’s job required them to be at the office. All conversations were by Slack, all meetings were by Zoom even if we were all in the office. They could have knocked down the office space and put in at least two more industrial printers. Considering how backed up we got around Christmas, that would have helped them.

        Some of this is just old assholes who think people need to be in the office all the time so they can watch them or something. I don’t know.

        At least they didn’t make me wear a tie.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My last job was highly similar. It honestly would have been more tolerable (the stress) if I’d just been able to work from home… I mean it’s not the sort of job you could pretend to do if not being monitored, it was metric-driven and triggered by customer contact… so what’s the point?

          They said “we want to foster communication so having people in the office does that!” Umm my department is the only one in the company that is chained to our desk…? We can’t get up because we have to be available for contacts… and when people come by to talk to us, it’s usually a bad thing because they are interrupting actual real work. To top it off, our cube cell thing was right next to the door where everyone hung out waiting for each other to go to lunch, and because we were the only department that did external contact, they didn’t even think to shut the fuck up.

          I’ll never willingly work in an office again. Not just because my disability makes commuting difficult sometimes, but because the environment is just -bad-.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it’s miserable. I wasn’t kidding about the tie part either. Pretty much the only thing I liked about that job is that no one cared if I showed up in a T-shirt and sweatpants.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                It absolutely hasn’t from my own personal experience. Maybe it’s the industry you’re in, but I’m amazed you haven’t at least seen things like people on their lunch breaks outside or in a restaurant or whatever wearing a tie.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed 100%. I used to work a hybrid schedule and I was much more efficient when I was at home and could be both relaxed and not distracted or annoyed by coworkers.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are about more efficiency in enriching themselves. Forcing people back into inefficient office-based work is just a tool to fire huge chunks of them while filtering for those easier exploited.

  • formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree! If Elon musk cannot show up to his offices at Tesla, SpaceX, Twitter, xAI, and Washington for 8 hours Monday-Friday, he should be fired without severance as CEO or co-chair of his government department.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least they’re open about it: The entire point (according to them) is attrition. The actual plan is to make work for these people much more hostile so they quit.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think our tax bills will drop if they succeed in forcing these million employees to quit?

      They said they want to run the government like a business, and it looks like that’s what they’re pursuing. Unfortunately, that just means they’ll give us the lowest quality service at the highest possible price.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They said they want to run the government like a business,

        In other words: terribly. They want to run the government terribly, exactly how business runs in this country.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ll spend all of their time changing the direction of what everyone is working on, hiring and firing people, and doing re-orgs…just like a real US business!

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Working from home for all jobs that it is compatible with should be a mandate to help lower the amount of gas necessary for commuting.

  • nanami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A people elected government has a mandate to protect its people. Its real frightening to see that instead it announces adopt the worst business practises of private economy.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless Musk somehow copied himself several times, he is working remote for most of his companies each day.

  • GreyYeti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It did seem weird to me that Harris or any of the other democratic candidates campaigned on remote work. Seems like a smart pro-worker position to take that would directly impact a group she was trying to court: college educated professionals who skew male. Plus lower environmental impact, cheaper gas, more opportunities for working parents, etc.

    The cynical reason I assume it wasn’t a talking point is because the 1% who directed the media conversation had a vested interest in return to pre-Covid status quo.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Campaigning on remote work doesn’t really resonate with blue collar workers, though.

      They’ve got to be where the work actually is to do their job.

      It’s only the “paper pushers” who have the provelege of working remotely.