Summary

Elon Musk, co-head of the Department of Government Efficiency under Donald Trump’s advisory team, revised his claim of finding $2 trillion in federal budget cuts to a “best-case outcome” of $1 trillion.

Musk’s earlier target, dismissed as unrealistic by experts, had included the entire discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion.

While Musk and co-lead Vivek Ramaswamy plan to recommend cuts, specifics remain unclear.

Experts warn savings may require targeting mandatory programs like Medicaid, potentially causing hardships.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Okay, I feel like I’m going crazy here.

    Can someone please acknowledge the fact that Elon Musk, as a private citizen, just created his very own government department, and people seem to be just going along with it?

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    next year they’ll raise the deficit by $2T and start saying that they saved $2T off of a $4T raise to the budget

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sounds like they’re not an efficient use of government resources and should be cut

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If RFK is crazy because a worm ate part of his brain, it seems like Enron Musk may have had drugs that are the equivalent of 2 worms.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If allowed, Elon will find trillions to funnel to himself and Trump’s cronies however.

    • d00phy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh make no mistake, his goal is to be the world’s first trillionaire within the next 4-years. Why else would he so publicly be going full fascist unless he was ready to fully embrace the concept of “fuck everyone and everything ever to be” money.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh? The places he’s looking at actually work fairly efficiently already? Or the inefficiencies are outside their control? The inefficient sections are the places he can’t go, like the DOD?

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any inefficiency likely comes from private industry bending the government over and stealing our wallet. I’ve been paid obscenely better as a contractor than my government counterparts, and I’m probably only seeing half of what my company charges. Entire departments are twenty contractors at a cost of $5 million per year and two actual government employees making a grand total of $60k each. Maybe double that at most by the time you include all the benefits.

      But if you try to trim that, you’re cutting into the profits of private industry, and we sure as fuck can’t have that, can we?

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        And a bunch of bureaucracy in government with budgets, approvals and checks etc were put in place as cost cutting in the first place.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or they’ve already had their budgets slashed so much that there’s nothing left to slash. Which is pretty common unfortunately.

  • pastaPersona@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man, it’s almost like he has no idea what he’s talking about or something. Definitely a good candidate to be making policy decisions affecting millions of people.

  • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Anyone who actually believed they would find $2 trillion was an idiot, the rest of us knew they’d just cut the things they hate, bump the subsidies that favor them and their friends, and call it a day.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not even there. DoD is ~$840B and DHS another sixty. Not even one trillion in the entire US security apparatus, but they were going to so easily find twice that. It was always pure nonsense.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I expect them to privatize and then somehow claim they cut the budget because they are paying a private company instead of running whole departments themselves (govt)

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The funny thing is…it’s not like their voters would care if they lied. They could literally say “We cut the budget by $17 trillion by making sure the trans kids don’t get surgeries!” And their voters would fucking cheer.

      They wouldn’t look deep enough to actually care what they cut.

      So the question is why even make this announcement? I’m guessing it’s a distraction from something else.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your comment will age poorly when Trump’s tarrifs lead to a collapsing economy and he prints money like mad to solve it, resulting in hyper-inflation letting President Musk keep his election promise.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ahh, his administration hasn’t even officially begun and already we have the Memberberry shadow president. I think someone should have t-shirts made up.

    The next 4-years are going to be… I honestly have NFC.